How discount curves, FX rates, and cross-currency basis determine the fair value of a currency swap.
On this page
Pricing a currency swap means valuing two sets of future cash flows in two different currencies and comparing them on a common basis. At inception, dealers normally set the contract so that the value is approximately zero to both sides, ignoring transaction costs and credit adjustments. After inception, the mark-to-market changes as discount curves, benchmark expectations, FX rates, and basis spreads move.
For DFOL, students do not need full quant-library implementation. They do need to understand the pricing logic well enough to identify what drives fair value and why the mark-to-market changes over time.
The Inception Objective
When a new currency swap is struck, the quoted fixed rate or spread is chosen so that:
the present value of one leg
equals the present value of the other leg
after both are expressed in a common valuation currency.
Conceptually:
$$
\text{PV(leg A)} = \text{PV(leg B)}
$$
This is the same high-level idea as an interest rate swap, but with one additional complication: the legs are in different currencies.
Main Inputs to Pricing
The value of a currency swap depends on:
the notional amount in each currency
current spot or agreed exchange relationships
the fixed coupon, if any
projected floating rates on any floating leg
discount factors for each currency
any cross-currency basis spread
whether principal is exchanged at inception and maturity
Students should remember that there is no single all-purpose discount curve for both legs. Each currency has its own term structure.
Discounting the Two Legs
If a leg is denominated in Canadian dollars, it should be discounted using appropriate Canadian discount factors. If a leg is denominated in U.S. dollars, it should be discounted using U.S. discount factors.
In current market practice, modern discounting intuition is tied to overnight-rate frameworks such as:
CORRA in Canadian dollars
SOFR in U.S. dollars
That does not mean every exam question becomes a model-building exercise. It means students should not fall back on outdated benchmark assumptions when the question is about current-market pricing.
Fixed-Leg Valuation
The fixed leg is straightforward once the coupon is known:
$$
\text{PV}_{\text{fixed}} = N \times K \times \sum_{i=1}^{n} \alpha_i P(0,t_i)
$$
Where:
N is the notional
K is the fixed coupon
\alpha_i is the accrual fraction
P(0,t_i) is the discount factor to payment date t_i
If principal is exchanged at maturity, the discounted principal repayment must also be added to the valuation of that leg.
Floating-Leg Valuation
The floating leg requires projected future benchmark cash flows. Market participants typically use forward curves to estimate those floating payments.
Conceptually, the steps are:
project future benchmark fixings
calculate expected coupon amounts
discount those projected amounts in the leg’s own currency
For a newly reset floating leg, the value is often close to par under standard assumptions. As time passes and curves move, the floating leg’s market value changes.
Converting to a Common Valuation Currency
Because the two legs are in different currencies, they must be expressed in a common valuation currency before the values can be compared.
One conceptual way to write the foreign-currency leg in domestic terms is:
D_F(0,t_i) is the foreign-currency discount factor
X_i represents the relevant FX conversion assumption
The exact implementation can vary, but the key exam idea is stable: each leg is valued in its own currency first, then translated onto a common basis.
Cross-Currency Basis Matters
Currency swap pricing is not just spot FX plus two domestic curves. The market may require an additional cross-currency basis spread to reflect supply, demand, funding pressures, and balance-sheet conditions across currencies.
Students do not need a full basis-curve construction process, but they should understand the point:
if one currency is structurally more in demand for swap funding
the quoted spread may adjust to reflect that imbalance
Ignoring cross-currency basis can produce a misleading valuation.
flowchart LR
A["Domestic discount curve"] --> D["Leg valuation"]
B["Foreign discount curve"] --> D
C["FX and basis inputs"] --> D
D --> E["Common-currency present value"]
Why the Mark-to-Market Changes
After inception, the swap’s value can move because:
interest-rate curves shift
expected floating coupons change
FX rates move
basis spreads widen or tighten
the remaining maturity shortens
This is why a swap that began at zero can later have meaningful positive value to one side and negative value to the other.
Common Pitfalls
discounting both legs with the same curve
assuming spot FX alone determines value
ignoring the role of cross-currency basis
using outdated benchmark assumptions for modern pricing
confusing fair value at inception with mark-to-market after inception
Key Takeaways
Currency swap pricing compares the present value of two currency legs on a common valuation basis.
Each leg must be discounted using the appropriate curve for its own currency.
Floating legs require projected benchmark cash flows, while fixed legs are valued from known coupons.
FX conversion and cross-currency basis are central to the valuation.
The swap’s mark-to-market changes after inception as rates, FX, and basis move.
Sample Exam Question
What is the clearest reason a currency swap cannot be priced by looking only at the fixed coupon and spot exchange rate?
A. Because no discounting is needed
B. Because both legs also depend on discount curves, future floating rates, and basis effects
C. Because currency swaps are always exchange-traded
D. Because principal is never exchanged
Correct Answer: B. Because both legs also depend on discount curves, future floating rates, and basis effects
Explanation: Currency swap valuation depends on the full discounted cash-flow structure of both legs, not just the coupon and current spot FX rate.
### What is the pricing objective for a newly negotiated currency swap?
- [x] To set terms so the present value of the two legs is approximately equal at inception
- [ ] To maximize the fixed payer's immediate gain
- [ ] To eliminate all future FX risk permanently
- [ ] To avoid using discount factors
> **Explanation:** New swap terms are normally quoted so the contract begins with approximately zero value to both sides.
### Why must each currency leg be discounted separately?
- [ ] Because each leg is always cleared in a different country
- [x] Because each currency has its own discount curve and benchmark structure
- [ ] Because discounting applies only to fixed legs
- [ ] Because floating legs are never discounted
> **Explanation:** Each currency leg must be valued using the term structure appropriate to that currency.
### Which benchmark framework is most consistent with current Canadian discounting intuition?
- [ ] CDOR as the default for all new trades
- [ ] LIBOR
- [x] CORRA
- [ ] Prime rate only
> **Explanation:** Current Canadian benchmark thinking is built around CORRA rather than legacy CDOR default assumptions.
### What does the floating leg require for valuation?
- [ ] Only the original fixed coupon
- [ ] Only the maturity date
- [x] Projected future benchmark cash flows and discounting
- [ ] No market inputs after inception
> **Explanation:** Floating coupons must be projected using forward-looking benchmark assumptions and then discounted.
### Why is cross-currency basis important?
- [ ] Because it replaces FX entirely
- [ ] Because it applies only to commodity swaps
- [x] Because it reflects funding and market imbalance between currencies and can affect quoted value
- [ ] Because it eliminates counterparty risk
> **Explanation:** Cross-currency basis captures an important market pricing adjustment beyond spot FX and domestic curves.
### Why can the mark-to-market of a currency swap move after inception?
- [ ] Because the notional disappears
- [ ] Because discounting no longer matters
- [x] Because rates, FX, basis, and remaining maturity all change over time
- [ ] Because fixed coupons reset daily
> **Explanation:** The value of the swap changes as the market inputs used in valuation evolve.